Supplier offers are difficult to compare
Scope, exclusions, output definitions, warranty, service and integration assumptions differ between quotations.
Total Cost of Ownership Consulting
Independent TCO analysis for manufacturing equipment, automation and supplier proposals, grounded in the real product mix, operating model and lifecycle risk.
Present your factory problem →Practical approach
A lower quotation can become the most expensive option after integration, ramp-up, changeovers, scrap, energy, maintenance, spares, downtime and labour are included.
We build a transparent decision model that separates supplier claims from verified assumptions and compares conservative, expected and upper-bound scenarios over the useful life of the investment.
Scope, exclusions, output definitions, warranty, service and integration assumptions differ between quotations.
The business case assumes demand, efficiency, labour removal or ramp-up that may not materialise.
Maintenance, spares, energy, quality loss, training, obsolescence and downtime are not modelled consistently.
What you receive
Engagement model
Agree useful life, production demand, product mix, shifts, financing and required return.
Compare inclusions, exclusions, performance definitions, service and integration responsibility.
Quantify cash cost, capacity benefit, risk exposure and sensitivity over time.
Specify acceptance tests, contractual protections and the conditions for approval.
FAQ
No. ROI compares benefit with investment, while TCO identifies all relevant lifecycle costs. A credible CAPEX decision should use both.
Yes. The useful output is not a score based only on price; it is a normalised comparison of scope, assumptions, operating consequences and risk.
Supplier proposals, expected demand and mix, current performance, labour tasks, utilities, maintenance assumptions, integration scope and ramp-up expectations. An initial gap review can start with incomplete data.
Related services